Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Archive for the ‘Civil Rights’ Category

OK, sorry I haven’t posted in awhile, but I just have to say something about the protests in Anaheim, CA…

Wednesday, July 25th, 2012

First off, I’m so glad so many racist bigoted assholes have chosen to move out of California. Good fucking riddance. For the rest of you racist, bigoted assholes still polluting my state, please MOVE. We Californians who aren’t bigoted, racist assholes will be more than glad to see you leave. I’m just SO done with all the fuckheads bitching about this state. Don’t like it? MOVE!
But, I digress…
Orange County, California is a bigoted shithole. Anyone who isn’t white, straight and male is not welcome in Orange County. For the life of me, I don’t see why anyone not white, straight or male even attempts to live there. And-I’m not surprised Anaheim has erupted into riots over the illegal shootings of Latino males. I’ve been expecting this for a VERY long time. See, I used to live in Orange County. That’s why I say point blank that OC is a racist, sexist, homophobic shithole. I fucking KNOW how bad it is there for anyone who isn’t white. Throughout the 15 years I was unlucky enough to stay in that shithole, I saw a lot of OC cops harass people who were of another skin color. Asians were OK, but if you’re Black or Latino in OC, you get harassed by the cops. A lot. I had a lot of friends-middle class, law abiding people, mind you-that were harassed. For no reason. And yet, nobody did or said anything in response. They couldn’t. If they had, the harassment would have been worse, and it was the cop’s word against yours. As for the riots, it did my heart good to see the Latinos finally rise up and kick some cracker ass last night. I don’t believe violence solves problems, but the cops in OC have been harassing the Latino population for so long that I was amazed they finally had enough.So, to see the Latinos in Anaheim finally protest their shitty treatment was awesome to witness. For some stupid reason, I stayed in that horrible place for 15 years, and wasn’t able to get out of there until 1996, when I moved to Long Beach. I’ve been in LA County ever since, and LA County is a better place to live, especially if you’re not white, straight and male.
OK, if they were gang members, so what? As long as the gangs behave themselves and cause no problems, they’re pretty much left alone here in LA County. Now, of course they don’t do that, so they do attract police attention. However, you don’t hear of the LAPD or the LA Sheriffs shooting some guy in the back as they are running away from the cops. You don’t hear of the LAPD or LA Sheriffs beating a homeless man to death, like the Fullerton cops. That shit does not happen here. And, that shit shouldn’t happen in OC either.
Frankly, anyone still living in OC who’s not white straight or male would be advised to move out of there. Come to LA County. We’re not gang ridden like the assholes in OC like to tell you. And-you won’t get shot by an OC cop for no damn good reason,either.

Share

We have to CRUSH these motherfuckers…

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

Fuck being polite-this is WAR. If we do not re-elect the President by a landslide, this behavior will spread across the country. I don’t know about you, but if I were a gay or lesbian kid in this particular shithole I’d start packing heat. No, I’m not kidding-I’m so pissed I could spit nails. This is from Rolling Stone about Michelle Bachmann’s district in Minnesota where they are trying to kill gay and lesbian kids-and succeeding:
Motherfucking assholes. No other word for these people.


It’s starting to change. That’s the good news. People are starting to wake up. And not too late, either. It’s just in fucking time.

Share

The “good old days” can go to hell.

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

I sometimes wonder if the Republican Party has become the receding roar of white America as it pines for a way of life that will never return.


Nostalgia is nice as far as it goes, but it’s no way to run a country. In fact, nostalgia for a “simpler time” when “values meant something” is a GREAT way to start a shooting civil war. Just ask the Confederates.
Since the ’70′s I’ve heard the same old tired refrain from old white Republican guys: “It’s time to take this country back to when men were men, women were women-and if they weren’t, we raped and beat them until they WERE, fa**ots were in the closet-and if they even thought about getting out, we’d beat them to death, n***rs were lynched if they dared step out of line and WE RULED. WITH AN IRON FIST. We white men stomped out ANY AND ALL rebellion from these so-called “minorities”. And God told us to do it.” Now, the old white Republican guys dared not put it THAT way, but when they talk about “taking America back” that’s EXACTLY WHAT THEY MEAN. Oh, they can put all the flowery scented bullshit on it they want, but that’s exactly what happened in “the good old days”. Hamden Rice recently put it this way in an incredibly good diary (a rarity these days) on Daily Kos last year:


So anyway, I was having this argument with my father about Martin Luther King and how his message was too conservative compared to Malcolm X’s message. My father got really angry at me. It wasn’t that he disliked Malcolm X, but his point was that Malcolm X hadn’t accomplished anything as Dr. King had.

I was kind of sarcastic and asked something like, so what did Martin Luther King accomplish other than giving his “I have a dream speech.”

Before I tell you what my father told me, I want to digress. Because at this point in our amnesiac national existence, my question pretty much reflects the national civic religion view of what Dr. King accomplished. He gave this great speech. Or some people say, “he marched.” I was so angry at Mrs. Clinton during the primaries when she said that Dr. King marched, but it was LBJ who delivered the Civil Rights Act.

At this point, I would like to remind everyone exactly what Martin Luther King did, and it wasn’t that he “marched” or gave a great speech.

My father told me with a sort of cold fury, “Dr. King ended the terror of living in the south.”

Please let this sink in and and take my word and the word of my late father on this. If you are a white person who has always lived in the U.S. and never under a brutal dictatorship, you probably don’t know what my father was talking about.

But this is what the great Dr. Martin Luther King accomplished. Not that he marched, nor that he gave speeches.

He ended the terror of living as a black person, especially in the south.

I’m guessing that most of you, especially those having come fresh from seeing “The Help,” may not understand what this was all about. But living in the south (and in parts of the mid west and in many ghettos of the north) was living under terrorism.

It wasn’t that black people had to use a separate drinking fountain or couldn’t sit at lunch counters, or had to sit in the back of the bus.

You really must disabuse yourself of this idea. Lunch counters and buses were crucial symbolic planes of struggle that the civil rights movement decided to use to dramatize the issue, but the main suffering in the south did not come from our inability to drink from the same fountain, ride in the front of the bus or eat lunch at Woolworth’s.

It was that white people, mostly white men, occasionally went berserk, and grabbed random black people, usually men, and lynched them. You all know about lynching. But you may forget or not know that white people also randomly beat black people, and the black people could not fight back, for fear of even worse punishment.

This constant low level dread of atavistic violence is what kept the system running. It made life miserable, stressful and terrifying for black people.

White people also occasionally tried black people, especially black men, for crimes for which they could not conceivably be guilty. With the willing participation of white women, they often accused black men of “assault,” which could be anything from rape to not taking off one’s hat, to “reckless eyeballing.”

This is going to sound awful and perhaps a stain on my late father’s memory, but when I was little, before the civil rights movement, my father taught me many, many humiliating practices in order to prevent the random, terroristic, berserk behavior of white people. The one I remember most is that when walking down the street in New York City side by side, hand in hand with my hero-father, if a white woman approached on the same sidewalk, I was to take off my hat and walk behind my father, because he had been taught in the south that black males for some reason were supposed to walk single file in the presence of any white lady.

This was just one of many humiliating practices we were taught to prevent white people from going berserk.

I remember a huge family reunion one August with my aunts and uncles and cousins gathered around my grandparent’s vast breakfast table laden with food from the farm, and the state troopers drove up to the house with a car full of rifles and shotguns, and everyone went kind of weirdly blank. They put on the masks that black people used back then to not provoke white berserkness. My strong, valiant, self educated, articulate uncles, whom I adored, became shuffling, Step-N-Fetchits to avoid provoking the white men. Fortunately the troopers were only looking for an escaped convict. Afterward, the women, my aunts, were furious at the humiliating performance of the men, and said so, something that even a child could understand.

This is the climate of fear that Dr. King ended.



So, the next time some Republican starts babbling about “taking America back” and “bringing back our values, etc.” remember-THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT. The white man rules and everyone else lives in fear. Is that something we want to go back to? Anyone? Yeah, I thought so. There will be a civil war in this country if the crazy-ass “Christians” ever dare try to institute that bullshit on us again. Count on it.


My grandmother was raised in Arkansas on a working farm. She had to get up at 4 in the morning every day to help her mother with the farm chores. She was the oldest girl in the family, so she couldn’t get out of it.
In those days, EVERYONE worked on the farm. When they said “family farm”, that’s what they meant. The reason why I mention this is because of a poem that my grandmother had framed and hanging in their house-it talked about doing the chores, cooking from scratch, etc. And it ended with this: “The good old days can go to hell.”
Well, the “Good old days” CAN GO TO HELL.

Share

Wisdom from Al Giordano…

Saturday, January 14th, 2012

From Al Giordano, via Smartypants:


Activism is the practice of preaching to the choir, rallying the already converted, and trying to convince other “activists” to do your work for you (say, call your Congressman, or write your Senator for or against a piece of legislation)…

Activism seeks media attention through protests and other means, errantly thinking it will draw others to its cause by doing so. This dominant tendency in “activism” becomes a circular, self-reinforcing, self-marginalizing, chest-thumping, bureaucratic and anally-retentive activity and a big waste of time with little impact on the issues or policies it seeks to change or defend.

Organizing is something completely different: It is based on attainable and quantifiable goals (be they small, as in, “put a stop sign in the neighborhood,” or be they large, as occurred last year: elect an underdog as president of the United States). Here’s a simple yardstick by which to measure: If it doesn’t involve knocking on doors, making phone calls or otherwise proactively communicating with people demographically different than you, it’s not organizing. If it doesn’t involve face-to-face building of relationships, teams, chains of command, and, day-by-day, clear goals to measure its progress and effectiveness, it’s not organizing. If it happens only on the Internet, that’s not organizing either.



Note to “activists”: Organizing works, “activism” doesn’t.

Share

The Naiveté Of The PL Runs Up Against The Same Old South In Georgia…RIP Troy Davis.

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

I watched the excellent coverage of the Troy Davis situation in Georgia a couple of nights ago on Democracy Now (Amy Goodman did one hell of a job reporting on the situation.), and I was absolutely appalled at the entire spectacle. It was horrible to sit and watch as Mr. Davis’ relatives desperately clung to any ray of hope of saving his life. And yet, I knew it was futile, and that’s what is really appalling to me. Let me say up front that I’m an opponent of the death penalty, and have been since I first read the book Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean many years ago. I believe the willy-nilly application of the death penalty is one of the worst stains on this country-the other being the virulent racism that often accompanies said application of the death penalty, especially in the South. It’s in that vein that I speak today. I decided to give this post a couple of days in order for everyone on both sides to begin the process of calming down, so to speak. So, here’s what I think.


For those of you that are disheartened by the execution of Troy Davis on Wednesday, I say this: What did you expect? That they would have actually LET HIM LIVE? Maybe in the North or West, but not in the South. The MAJOR reason Troy Davis isn’t alive today is that he was a black man accused of killing a white man in Georgia. That’s the way it’s always been there. If Officer McPhail had been black, I highly doubt Troy Davis would have even got the death penalty, and that’s the sad truth about this situation. I also think if Troy Davis hadn’t been on the scene of the murder of a police officer, that’s another reason Mr. Davis was executed. Police officers are very respected in the South, and if one is killed, the person who killed them gets an extra punishment specifically BECAUSE the person killed was in law enforcement. But, Officer McPhail was WHITE. That’s a whole different kettle of fish, and that’s what the people protesting either didn’t realize or were victims of the magical thinking that permeates so much of the Far Left. If we march around foaming at the mouth enough, they’ll listen. They won’t listen, folks. They’ll just flip you off. Look at the facts;


If you’re a black person in the South and you mess with another black person, that’s one thing. But Troy Davis was a dead man the moment Officer McPhail died, and it wasn’t because of Mr. Davis’ race. It was because of Officer McPhail’s. It didn’t matter that he didn’t kill the guy. That’s the really sad thing about this-yes, Troy Davis was most likely an innocent man. But-he was there. He said as much before he was executed.That, more than anything else, is what condemned him. Sure, the jury was mostly black. But-black folks have been conditioned to “other” people just as much as white folks have. It’s the “othering” of people that’s the real problem. The idea that some people are “human waste” or “the enemy”. Once again, the “us vs. them” bullshit. That’s the idea that needs to be shitcanned before we can even have a discussion about the death penalty. In it’s place? “There but for the grace of God go I” would be a start. There’s two mindsets that need to change. The “us vs. them” mindset and the “We’re the South. This is the way we do business. Don’t like it? Go fuck yourself!” mindset is the other one.


I’ve mentioned before that my grandparents were born in Arkansas, and had the good sense to leave the South after my mother was born. Anyone who believes this “new South” nonsense is naïve. Sure, a lot of things HAVE changed in the South, especially since the Civil Rights movement began in the 1950′s. Racism has pretty much gone underground, and there is a flourishing Black bourgeois in Atlanta among other big cities there. There’s also huge gay and lesbian communities in Southern big cities like Atlanta and Birmingham. However, that doesn’t mean the South is now a paradise of tolerance and acceptance. It’s not. It never was, and never will be with some people. The “new South” is still the same OLD SOUTH, especially when it comes to the justice system. And it doesn’t help when organizations like Amnesty International, the NAACP and the latest celebrities doujour start raising hell about the situation, giving it unwanted publicity. In fact, it makes it worse. All you had to do was watch as the Georgia Department of Corrections openly harassed and intimidated the supporters of Troy Davis keeping vigil at the prison where he died. I suspect that was one of the reasons why Larry Cox, the CEO of Amnesty USA, was having so much trouble keeping his emotions in check after the execution. He knew what message the State of Georgia was putting out there for the protesters and rest of the world concerned about Troy Davis not being given a fair shake. I can put it in two words; FUCK YOU.


Basically, what that is regards the attitude of the good ol’ boys and girls in Georgia when it comes to people protesting how they apply the death penalty. They don’t give a shit about some “liberals, hippies and Negroes bitching about how we treat our prisoners.” That’s why they acted the way they did. It was a big middle finger to the rest of the world who were actually concerned about the guilt or innocence of the condemned man. They don’t care if Troy Davis was actually innocent; just the fact that Davis was even peripherally around the scene made him guilty in their eyes. Which is why he’s dead, unfortunately.


They don’t think that prisoners are human beings who deserve equal treatment before the law. Especially if these prisoners are black,and if they did anything to a White person? They’re even worse. Of course, this is appalling to any other sane thinking person-both in the South and the North-but this is the way some Southerners think. It’s the “us vs. them” bullshit. As Sister Helen has put it in the past, there’s a whole lot of “othering” going on in this country, especially in the direction of African American people. Now, I’m not saying give up and don’t fight this when it happens. I’m not saying don’t work to abolish the death penalty both in the South and all over the country. Please do that-don’t give up. I’m saying realize that you’re going up against a mindset that’s been entrenched in the South since..well, since the country BEGAN. Since the 1700′s when African slaves were first brought here.


Dump the magical thinking and take a look at that mindset so firmly entrenched in the South it’s almost as much of an institution there as grits and sausage gravy and biscuits. Put yourself in their shoes for a minute. If you had been told all your life that certain people-better known as “us”-are civilized and other people-also known as “them”-are not, how would you approach anyone protesting how you deal with the “others” be they black men on Death Row or white women who want to choose what happens to their own bodies or a gay man or woman wanting to serve his or her country? Then and only then will you be able to get them to see reason. That mindset, that some people are “better” than others, is a big part of Southern culture, especially in Alabama, Mississippi and Georgia. It’s going to take decades to get rid of it.


I suspect this is the beginning of the end of the death penalty in this country. Now that there’s an actual face and name that people can identify with instead of “othering” him as Sister Helen puts it; now that folks on the Right are starting to realize that the death penalty is unevenly applied according to race-and ESPECIALLY in the South; It’s my hope that Sister Helen’s voice-along with others like Larry Cox-will be listened to and this horrific practice is permanently abolished in every state in the Union. But, mark my words-the LAST place where death will be taken off the table is Alabama, Mississipi, Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, West Virginia, and so on. In other words, the South.

Edited to add: From Bradblog,the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles goes on to prove me right. This case is from 2008:


The parole board in the state of Georgia spared a convicted killer from execution hours before he was due to die by lethal injection on Thursday and commuted his sentence to life in prison.

The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles made its decision less than three hours before Samuel David Crowe, 47, was to be executed, according to a spokeswoman for the state’s prisons.

“After careful and exhaustive consideration of the requests, the board voted to grant clemency. The board voted to commute the sentence to life without parole,” the parole board said.

In March 1988, Crowe killed store manager Joseph Pala during a robbery at the lumber company in Douglas County, west of Atlanta. Crowe, who had previously worked at the store, shot Pala three times with a pistol, beat him with a crowbar and a pot of paint.

Crowe pleaded guilty to armed robbery and murder and was sentenced to death the following year.

“David (Crowe) takes full responsibility for his crime and experiences profound remorse,” according to Georgians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, an advocacy group, who welcomed the board’s decision.


The difference? Mr Crowe is WHITE-and he fully confessed to what he did. Oh, and he’s supposedly born again now. You notice the word I capitalized. Once again, it’s the same old South-just wrapped prettier.

Share

What works and what doesn’t-why the Petulant Left is a consistant FAILURE

Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

Why is it that the PL tends to approve methods of political activism that frankly, do not work, like the anti-Vietnam War movement of the late 1960′s? As opposed to the anti-Vietnam movement, you had Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights movement. That was a grass roots political movement that actually WORKED, and there were particular reasons that it did so. They didn’t march around foaming at the mouth or screaming four letter words at the police. They did march, but they did so with solemnity and dignity instead of screaming and yelling. They sang gospel songs rather than scream four letter words. Instead of long hair, dirty T-shirts and jeans,looking like they hadn’t bathed for a month (and some hadn’t) there were dresses and business suits, clean and neatly pressed. Even the kids and teen agers were in their best clothes.

The Civil Rights protesters were folks who understood that you get more flies with honey than vinegar, therefore they chose to act appropriately and without foaming at the mouth. They knew that anger or violence on their part would spell the end of the movement, so they avoided it. They instead appealed to the grand majority of fair minded people-of all colors-in our country, instead of just sticking to the South. They knew if they did that, eventually their faith in the system would prevail. And it has, to a certain extent. No, the Civil Rights movement is not over. We do NOT live in a post-racial America-yet. But thanks to Dr. King and the people who marched with him, a post-racial America is much closer than we can imagine right now.


So, if the Civil Rights movement started in the early 1960′s by such great people as Rosa Parks, Dorothy Height, Martin Luther King Jr and Bayard Rustin can be considered a smashing success by historians, why did the anti-Vietnam War movement refuse to copy it, or at least use SOME of their tactics? Why did the anti War Left choose instead to do the almost total opposite of what Dr. King and company did? What was it? Was it too dignified? It wasn’t “cool” or “sexy” enough? Too much Christianity in the mix? Not enough four letter words? What was it that made the Civil Rights movement a non-desirable template for the anti-War movement?


I frankly believe there wasn’t enough anger on the part of the Civil Rights movement. The anti-War movement was steaming mad at the government for the Vietnam War, and proceeded to show it on a world stage from 1967 to 1971. The anti-Vietnam War movement was one huge temper tantrum that destroyed property and even some lives-just look at the Kent State shootings. Sure, the anti-Vietnam War people were able to command the attention of the country, but were they successful? Nixon ignored the protesters and invaded Cambodia anyway. He was able to handle the war pretty much with impunity. Did throwing the world’s biggest temper tantrum actually do any good? No. Instead of ending the war in 1967 or 1968, the war ended in 1975 and only because Nixon and Kissinger negotiated a peace treaty with the Viet Cong. The anti-Vietnam War protesters had absolutely nothing to do with ending the war. But-tell them that.


That’s why the Petulant Left hate President Obama so much. Instead of becoming Samuel L. Jackson in a Tarantino movie, he’s chosen to emulate Dr. King and the people of the Civil Rights movement, as both Norbrook and TiMT have mentioned on the People’s View. And you know what? That’s what actually works. People notice someone who’s calm, cool and collected. They don’t notice the petulant children throwing a temper tantrum-or they are annoyed by it. That’s one of the major reasons I think the President will win re-election in 2012-they’d rather have the calm, reasonable guy at the helm. So, look for the PL to throw more fits-and look for the rest of us to ignore the hell out of them. It’s not like their tactics actually WORK. They don’t.

Share